Just as there are social conservatives, there are social liberals. I define “social liberal” as anybody who is liberal when it comes to social issues. It the opposite of social conservative. Regarding life, family and sexual issues, whatever the social conservative believes, the social liberal believes the opposite. Party affiliation is not necessarily an indication of somebody’s stance on social issues. For example, I believe that most Democrats are social liberals, but I also know that some are not. There are growing numbers of Republicans embracing social liberalism but typically the Republican party is the home of social conservatives.
Here is a chart I made to show how social liberals are at odds with science. It is reductive for a reason. I want to make it clear how a certain demographic (the older generation) exercises “sexual liberty” at the expense of another demographic (their offspring). The negative impact on their offspring is ignored, downplayed, or denied by social liberals.
|Issue||Science says…||Social liberals say…|
|Does human life begin at conception?||Yes||No|
|Is sexual orientation innate and fixed?||No||Yes|
|Is “gender identity” fixed at birth?||Yes||No|
|Do children fare better with their own married mother and father?||Yes||No|
|Do fertile couples have a right to pregnancy free coitus?||No||Yes|
|Is divorce harmful?||Yes||No|
|Is pornography harmful?||Yes||No|
|Is gay sexual activity harmful?||Yes||No|
|Are men and women different?||Yes||No|
I’m sure I could add more things to this list.